token.app › Compare › Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Muse Spark 1.2

Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Muse Spark 1.2

Mistral Small 3.2 24B is 15× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Small 3.2 24BMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderMistral AIMeta
Input $/1M$0.094$1.25
Output $/1M$0.250$4.25
Blended $/1M$0.133$2.00
Context window256K1.0M
Max output16K—
ReleasedJun 2025Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Mistral Small 3.2 24B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.133 vs $2.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Small 3.2 24B or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Small 3.2 24B and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Small 3.2 24B cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B is cheaper: $0.133 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.094 vs $1.25. Output alone: $0.250 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Mistral Small 3.2 24B and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B: 256,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Small 3.2 24B and Muse Spark 1.2?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B is made by Mistral AI. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.
Related comparisons
Mistral Small 3.2 24B full details Muse Spark 1.2 full details Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Qwen3.8 Max Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Inkling Small Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Qwen3.7 Flash