token.app › Compare › Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 36× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $1.25 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $4.25 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $2.00 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $2.00 blended
FAQ
Which is better, Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Muse Spark 1.2 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.25 vs $0.030. Output alone: $4.25 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.