token.app › Compare › Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 2.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderNVIDIADeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.060$0.150
Output $/1M$0.240$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.105$0.262
Context window262K1.0M
Max output236K393K
ReleasedDec 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.105 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper: $0.105 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.060 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.240 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is made by NVIDIA. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Flint (free) Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Glimpse Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Mercury 3