token.app › Compare › Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 15× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.300 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $2.40 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.825 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 236K | 66K |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Nemotron 3 Super if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.825 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nemotron 3 Super cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.825 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.030. Output alone: $2.40 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Nemotron 3 Super: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Nemotron 3 Super is made by NVIDIA. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons