token.app › Compare › Nemotron 3 Ultra (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Nemotron 3 Ultra (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 12× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nemotron 3 Ultra (batch)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.300$0.030
Output $/1M$1.80$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.675$0.055
Context window512K1M
Max output66K
ReleasedJun 2026Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Nemotron 3 Ultra (batch) if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.675 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nemotron 3 Ultra (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nemotron 3 Ultra (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nemotron 3 Ultra (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.675 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.030. Output alone: $1.80 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Nemotron 3 Ultra (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Nemotron 3 Ultra (batch): 512,288 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Nemotron 3 Ultra (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Nemotron 3 Ultra (batch) is made by NVIDIA. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons