token.app › Compare › Nemotron 3 Ultra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 4.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nemotron 3 UltraDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderNVIDIADeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.600$0.150
Output $/1M$2.40$0.600
Blended $/1M$1.05$0.262
Context window262K1.0M
Max output183K393K
ReleasedJun 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Nemotron 3 Ultra if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $1.05 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nemotron 3 Ultra or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nemotron 3 Ultra and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nemotron 3 Ultra cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $1.05 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.600 vs $0.150. Output alone: $2.40 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Nemotron 3 Ultra and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Nemotron 3 Ultra: 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Nemotron 3 Ultra and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Nemotron 3 Ultra is made by NVIDIA. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons