token.app › Compare › Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) vs Flint (free)

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) vs Flint (free)

Flint (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free)Flint (free)
ProviderNVIDIARecursive
Input $/1MFreeFree
Output $/1MFreeFree
Blended $/1MFreeFree
Context window128K262K
Max output8K236K
ReleasedJun 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Flint (free) if…
  • Larger context window (262K)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) or Flint (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) and Flint (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) cheaper than Flint (free)?
They cost the same on a blended 3:1 basis: Free per million tokens.
What context windows do Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) and Flint (free) have?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free): 128,000 tokens. Flint (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) and Flint (free)?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) is made by NVIDIA. Flint (free) is made by Recursive.
Related comparisons
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) full details Flint (free) full details Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) vs Glimpse Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) vs Mercury 3