token.app › Compare › Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 2.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nemotron 3.5 LightningDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderNVIDIADeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.070$0.150
Output $/1M$0.200$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.103$0.262
Context window262K1.0M
Max output236K393K
ReleasedAug 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Lightning if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.103 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper: $0.103 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.070 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.200 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is made by NVIDIA. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Flint (free) Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Glimpse Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Mercury 3