token.app › Compare › Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 1.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $0.150 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $0.500 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.237 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 236K | 393K |
| Released | Oct 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL if…
- Costs less per token — $0.237 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nemotron 3.5 Super VL cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is cheaper: $0.237 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.500 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is made by NVIDIA. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL full details
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Flint (free)
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free)
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Glimpse
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Mercury 3