token.app › Compare › o1 (batch) vs Claude Sonnet 5

o1 (batch) vs Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is 3.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Claude Sonnet 5 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
o1 (batch)Claude Sonnet 5
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
Input $/1M$7.50$2.00
Output $/1M$30.00$10.00
Blended $/1M$13.13$4.00
Context window200K1M
Max output100K128K
ReleasedDec 2024Jun 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose o1 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Claude Sonnet 5 if…
  • Costs less per token — $4.00 vs $13.13 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jun 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, o1 (batch) or Claude Sonnet 5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both o1 (batch) and Claude Sonnet 5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is o1 (batch) cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5?
Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper: $4.00 versus $13.13 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $7.50 vs $2.00. Output alone: $30.00 vs $10.00.
What context windows do o1 (batch) and Claude Sonnet 5 have?
o1 (batch): 200,000 tokens. Claude Sonnet 5: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes o1 (batch) and Claude Sonnet 5?
o1 (batch) is made by OpenAI. Claude Sonnet 5 is made by Anthropic.
Related comparisons