token.app › Compare › o1-pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash
o1-pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 4773× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| o1-pro | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $150.00 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $600.00 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $262.50 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 100K | 66K |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose o1-pro if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $262.50 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, o1-pro or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both o1-pro and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is o1-pro cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $262.50 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $150.00 vs $0.030. Output alone: $600.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do o1-pro and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
o1-pro: 200,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes o1-pro and Qwen3.7 Flash?
o1-pro is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.