token.app › Compare › o1 vs Qwen3.8 Max

o1 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max is 8.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 Max accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
o1Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba
Input $/1M$15.00$2.00
Output $/1M$60.00$6.00
Blended $/1M$26.25$3.00
Context window200K1M
Max output100K131K
ReleasedDec 2024Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
GPQA Diamond 76.8% 92.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 73.3% 99.4%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose o1 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
  • Costs less per token — $3.00 vs $26.25 blended
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (92.7% vs 76.8%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (99.4% vs 73.3%)
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, o1 or Qwen3.8 Max?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, o1 leads on 0 and Qwen3.8 Max leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is o1 cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper: $3.00 versus $26.25 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $15.00 vs $2.00. Output alone: $60.00 vs $6.00.
What context windows do o1 and Qwen3.8 Max have?
o1: 200,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes o1 and Qwen3.8 Max?
o1 is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons