token.app › Compare › o3 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash
o3 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 32× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| o3 (batch) | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $1.00 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $4.00 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.75 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 100K | 66K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose o3 (batch) if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $1.75 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, o3 (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both o3 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is o3 (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $1.75 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.00 vs $0.030. Output alone: $4.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do o3 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
o3 (batch): 200,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes o3 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
o3 (batch) is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.