token.app › Compare › o3 Mini High (batch) vs GLM 5.2

o3 Mini High (batch) vs GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 is 2.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GLM 5.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
o3 Mini High (batch)GLM 5.2
ProviderOpenAIZhipu AI
Input $/1M$0.550$0.252
Output $/1M$2.20$0.792
Blended $/1M$0.963$0.387
Context window200K1.0M
Max output100K128K
ReleasedFeb 2025Jun 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose o3 Mini High (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose GLM 5.2 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.387 vs $0.963 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jun 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, o3 Mini High (batch) or GLM 5.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both o3 Mini High (batch) and GLM 5.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is o3 Mini High (batch) cheaper than GLM 5.2?
GLM 5.2 is cheaper: $0.387 versus $0.963 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.550 vs $0.252. Output alone: $2.20 vs $0.792.
What context windows do o3 Mini High (batch) and GLM 5.2 have?
o3 Mini High (batch): 200,000 tokens. GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes o3 Mini High (batch) and GLM 5.2?
o3 Mini High (batch) is made by OpenAI. GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI.
Related comparisons