token.app › Compare › o3 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B
o3 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 11× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.6 35B A3B accepts the larger context window (262K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| o3 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $8.00 | $0.950 |
| Blended $/1M | $3.50 | $0.313 |
| Context window | 200K | 262K |
| Max output | 100K | 236K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Apr 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | 84.8% |
| FrontierMath T1–3 | 33.3% | 20.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 84.4% | 86.7% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose o3 if…
- Higher FrontierMath T1–3 (33.3% vs 20.4%)
Choose Qwen3.6 35B A3B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.313 vs $3.50 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (84.8% vs 81.8%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (86.7% vs 84.4%)
- Larger context window (262K)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Apr 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, o3 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?
Across the 3 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, o3 leads on 1 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is o3 cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B?
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is cheaper: $0.313 versus $3.50 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.00 vs $0.100. Output alone: $8.00 vs $0.950.
What context windows do o3 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B have?
o3: 200,000 tokens. Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 262,144 tokens.
Who makes o3 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B?
o3 is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is made by Alibaba.