token.app › Compare › o3 vs Qwen3.8 Max

o3 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max is 1.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 Max accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
o3Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba
Input $/1M$2.00$2.00
Output $/1M$8.00$6.00
Blended $/1M$3.50$3.00
Context window200K1M
Max output100K131K
ReleasedApr 2025Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
GPQA Diamond 81.8% 92.7%
SimpleQA Verified 53.0% 46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 84.4% 99.4%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose o3 if…
  • Higher SimpleQA Verified (53.0% vs 46.3%)
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
  • Costs less per token — $3.00 vs $3.50 blended
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (92.7% vs 81.8%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (99.4% vs 84.4%)
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, o3 or Qwen3.8 Max?
Across the 3 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, o3 leads on 1 and Qwen3.8 Max leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is o3 cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper: $3.00 versus $3.50 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.00 vs $2.00. Output alone: $8.00 vs $6.00.
What context windows do o3 and Qwen3.8 Max have?
o3: 200,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes o3 and Qwen3.8 Max?
o3 is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons