token.app › Compare › o4 Mini High (batch) vs GLM 5.2

o4 Mini High (batch) vs GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 is 2.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GLM 5.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
o4 Mini High (batch)GLM 5.2
ProviderOpenAIZhipu AI
Input $/1M$0.550$0.252
Output $/1M$2.20$0.792
Blended $/1M$0.963$0.387
Context window200K1.0M
Max output100K128K
ReleasedApr 2025Jun 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose o4 Mini High (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose GLM 5.2 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.387 vs $0.963 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jun 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, o4 Mini High (batch) or GLM 5.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both o4 Mini High (batch) and GLM 5.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is o4 Mini High (batch) cheaper than GLM 5.2?
GLM 5.2 is cheaper: $0.387 versus $0.963 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.550 vs $0.252. Output alone: $2.20 vs $0.792.
What context windows do o4 Mini High (batch) and GLM 5.2 have?
o4 Mini High (batch): 200,000 tokens. GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes o4 Mini High (batch) and GLM 5.2?
o4 Mini High (batch) is made by OpenAI. GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI.
Related comparisons
o4 Mini High (batch) full details GLM 5.2 full details o4 Mini High (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) o4 Mini High (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 o4 Mini High (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max o4 Mini High (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest o4 Mini High (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 o4 Mini High (batch) vs Inkling Small