token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Llama 4 Scout split the 2 shared benchmarks evenly. Llama 4 Scout is 2.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Llama 4 Scout accepts the larger context window (1.3M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 72B InstructLlama 4 Scout
ProviderAlibabaMeta
Input $/1M$0.360$0.100
Output $/1M$0.400$0.300
Blended $/1M$0.370$0.150
Context window33K1.3M
Max output16K16K
ReleasedSep 2024Apr 2025
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
GPQA Diamond 49.1% 51.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 8.1% 7.8%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct if…
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (8.1% vs 7.8%)
Choose Llama 4 Scout if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.150 vs $0.370 blended
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (51.8% vs 49.1%)
  • Larger context window (1.3M)
  • Newer model (released Apr 2025)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Llama 4 Scout?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads on 1 and Llama 4 Scout leads on 1. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper: $0.150 versus $0.370 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.360 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.400 vs $0.300.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Llama 4 Scout have?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 32,768 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Llama 4 Scout?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta.
Related comparisons