token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Phi 4

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Phi 4

Phi 4 leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Phi 4 is 4.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct accepts the larger context window (33K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 72B InstructPhi 4
ProviderAlibabaMicrosoft
Input $/1M$0.360$0.070
Output $/1M$0.400$0.140
Blended $/1M$0.370$0.088
Context window33K16K
Max output16K16K
ReleasedSep 2024Jan 2025
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
GPQA Diamond 49.1% 56.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 8.1% 13.8%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct if…
  • Larger context window (33K)
Choose Phi 4 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.088 vs $0.370 blended
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (56.1% vs 49.1%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (13.8% vs 8.1%)
  • Newer model (released Jan 2025)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Phi 4?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads on 0 and Phi 4 leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct cheaper than Phi 4?
Phi 4 is cheaper: $0.088 versus $0.370 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.360 vs $0.070. Output alone: $0.400 vs $0.140.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Phi 4 have?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 32,768 tokens. Phi 4: 16,384 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Phi 4?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Phi 4 is made by Microsoft.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct full details Phi 4 full details Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Inkling Small