token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 24× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 7B InstructGemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.100$1.50
Output $/1M$0.200$7.50
Blended $/1M$0.125$3.00
Context window33K1.0M
Max output33K66K
ReleasedOct 2024Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen2.5 7B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.125 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 7B Instruct and Gemini 3.6 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 7B Instruct cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is cheaper: $0.125 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $1.50. Output alone: $0.200 vs $7.50.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 7B Instruct and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 32,768 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 7B Instruct and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct full details Gemini 3.6 Flash full details Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Inkling Small