token.app › Compare › Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is 5.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Gemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.400$1.50
Output $/1M$1.20$7.50
Blended $/1M$0.600$3.00
Context window1M1.0M
Max output33K66K
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.600 vs $3.00 blended
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and Gemini 3.6 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is cheaper: $0.600 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $1.50. Output alone: $1.20 vs $7.50.
What context windows do Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons