token.app › Compare › Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is 2.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)GPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderAlibabaOpenAI
Input $/1M$0.400$0.100
Output $/1M$1.20$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.600$0.225
Context window1M1.1M
Max output33K128K
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $0.600 blended
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and GPT-5.6 Luna, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper: $0.225 versus $0.600 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $0.100. Output alone: $1.20 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): 1,000,000 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is made by Alibaba. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.
Related comparisons
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) full details GPT-5.6 Luna full details Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Inkling Small