token.app › Compare › Qwen-Plus vs Grok 4.6

Qwen-Plus vs Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6 leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Qwen-Plus is 7.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen-Plus accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen-PlusGrok 4.6
ProviderAlibabaSpaceXAI
Input $/1M$0.260$2.00
Output $/1M$0.780$6.00
Blended $/1M$0.390$3.00
Context window1M500K
Max output33K450K
ReleasedFeb 2025Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
GPQA Diamond 48.1% 94.0%
OTIS Mock AIME 17.8% 99.2%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen-Plus if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.390 vs $3.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (94.0% vs 48.1%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (99.2% vs 17.8%)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen-Plus or Grok 4.6?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen-Plus leads on 0 and Grok 4.6 leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen-Plus cheaper than Grok 4.6?
Qwen-Plus is cheaper: $0.390 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.260 vs $2.00. Output alone: $0.780 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Qwen-Plus and Grok 4.6 have?
Qwen-Plus: 1,000,000 tokens. Grok 4.6: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen-Plus and Grok 4.6?
Qwen-Plus is made by Alibaba. Grok 4.6 is made by SpaceXAI.
Related comparisons