token.app › Compare › Qwen-Plus vs Llama 4 Scout
Qwen-Plus vs Llama 4 Scout
Qwen-Plus and Llama 4 Scout split the 2 shared benchmarks evenly. Llama 4 Scout is 2.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Llama 4 Scout accepts the larger context window (1.3M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen-Plus | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Meta |
| Input $/1M | $0.260 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $0.780 | $0.300 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.390 | $0.150 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.3M |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | 51.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 17.8% | 7.8% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen-Plus if…
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (17.8% vs 7.8%)
Choose Llama 4 Scout if…
- Costs less per token — $0.150 vs $0.390 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (51.8% vs 48.1%)
- Larger context window (1.3M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Apr 2025)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen-Plus or Llama 4 Scout?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen-Plus leads on 1 and Llama 4 Scout leads on 1. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen-Plus cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper: $0.150 versus $0.390 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.260 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.780 vs $0.300.
What context windows do Qwen-Plus and Llama 4 Scout have?
Qwen-Plus: 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
Who makes Qwen-Plus and Llama 4 Scout?
Qwen-Plus is made by Alibaba. Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta.