token.app › Compare › Qwen-Plus vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen-Plus vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Flash is 7.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen-PlusQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAlibabaAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.260$0.030
Output $/1M$0.780$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.390$0.055
Context window1M1M
Max output33K66K
ReleasedFeb 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
GPQA Diamond 48.1% 82.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 17.8% 86.7%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen-Plus if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.390 blended
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (82.3% vs 48.1%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (86.7% vs 17.8%)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen-Plus or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen-Plus leads on 0 and Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen-Plus cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.390 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.260 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.780 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Qwen-Plus and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Qwen-Plus: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen-Plus and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen-Plus is made by Alibaba. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons