token.app โ€บ Compare โ€บ Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 5.3ร— cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderAlibabaMeta
Input $/1M$0.250$1.25
Output $/1M$0.750$4.25
Blended $/1M$0.375$2.00
Context window128K1.0M
Max outputโ€”โ€”
ReleasedFeb 2025Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct ifโ€ฆ
  • Costs less per token โ€” $0.375 vs $2.00 blended
  • Open weights โ€” self-hostable
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 ifโ€ฆ
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is cheaper: $0.375 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.250 vs $1.25. Output alone: $0.750 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.
Related comparisons