token.app › Compare › Qwen3 14B vs Inkling
Qwen3 14B vs Inkling
Qwen3 14B is 12× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling accepts the larger context window (524K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3 14B | Inkling | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Thinkingmachines |
| Input $/1M | $0.120 | $1.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.240 | $4.05 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.150 | $1.76 |
| Context window | 41K | 524K |
| Max output | 16K | 472K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3 14B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.150 vs $1.76 blended
Choose Inkling if…
- Larger context window (524K)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 14B or Inkling?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 14B and Inkling, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 14B cheaper than Inkling?
Qwen3 14B is cheaper: $0.150 versus $1.76 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.120 vs $1.00. Output alone: $0.240 vs $4.05.
What context windows do Qwen3 14B and Inkling have?
Qwen3 14B: 40,960 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 14B and Inkling?
Qwen3 14B is made by Alibaba. Inkling is made by Thinkingmachines.