token.app › Compare › Qwen3 235B A22B vs Gemma 4 31B
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Gemma 4 31B
Gemma 4 31B leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks. Gemma 4 31B is 5.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemma 4 31B accepts the larger context window (262K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3 235B A22B | Gemma 4 31B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Input $/1M | $0.455 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $1.82 | $0.340 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.796 | $0.160 |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Max output | 8K | 262K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Apr 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
| GPQA Diamond | 70.7% | 75.8% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen3 235B A22B if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Gemma 4 31B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.160 vs $0.796 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (75.8% vs 70.7%)
- Larger context window (262K)
- Newer model (released Apr 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B or Gemma 4 31B?
Across the 1 benchmark both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen3 235B A22B leads on 0 and Gemma 4 31B leads on 1. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen3 235B A22B cheaper than Gemma 4 31B?
Gemma 4 31B is cheaper: $0.160 versus $0.796 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.455 vs $0.100. Output alone: $1.82 vs $0.340.
What context windows do Qwen3 235B A22B and Gemma 4 31B have?
Qwen3 235B A22B: 131,072 tokens. Gemma 4 31B: 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 235B A22B and Gemma 4 31B?
Qwen3 235B A22B is made by Alibaba. Gemma 4 31B is made by Google.