token.app › Compare › Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Mercury 3

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Mercury 3

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is 1.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Mercury 3
ProviderAlibabaInception
Input $/1M$0.090$0.100
Output $/1M$0.300$0.350
Blended $/1M$0.143$0.163
Context window262K1M
Max output236K131K
ReleasedJul 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.143 vs $0.163 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Mercury 3 if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 cheaper than Mercury 3?
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper: $0.143 versus $0.163 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.090 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.300 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Mercury 3 have?
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: 262,144 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Mercury 3?
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is made by Alibaba. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons