token.app › Compare › Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 5

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 5

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 13× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Claude Opus 5 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Claude Opus 5
ProviderAlibabaAnthropic
Input $/1M$0.200$5.00
Output $/1M$2.40$25.00
Blended $/1M$0.750$10.00
Context window82K1M
Max output33K128K
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.750 vs $10.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Claude Opus 5 if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 or Claude Opus 5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Claude Opus 5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 cheaper than Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper: $0.750 versus $10.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $5.00. Output alone: $2.40 vs $25.00.
What context windows do Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Claude Opus 5 have?
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens. Claude Opus 5: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is made by Alibaba. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 full details Claude Opus 5 full details Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Inkling Small