token.app › Compare › Qwen3 30B A3B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Qwen3 30B A3B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Qwen3 30B A3B is 1.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 30B A3BDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderAlibabaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.120$0.150
Output $/1M$0.500$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.215$0.262
Context window41K1.0M
Max output16K393K
ReleasedApr 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3 30B A3B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.215 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 30B A3B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 30B A3B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 30B A3B cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen3 30B A3B is cheaper: $0.215 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.120 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.500 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen3 30B A3B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Qwen3 30B A3B: 40,960 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 30B A3B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons