token.app › Compare › Qwen3 32B vs Kimi K3
Qwen3 32B vs Kimi K3
Qwen3 32B is 46× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Kimi K3 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3 32B | Kimi K3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Moonshot AI |
| Input $/1M | $0.080 | $3.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.280 | $15.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.130 | $6.00 |
| Context window | 131K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3 32B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.130 vs $6.00 blended
Choose Kimi K3 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 32B or Kimi K3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 32B and Kimi K3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 32B cheaper than Kimi K3?
Qwen3 32B is cheaper: $0.130 versus $6.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.080 vs $3.00. Output alone: $0.280 vs $15.00.
What context windows do Qwen3 32B and Kimi K3 have?
Qwen3 32B: 131,072 tokens. Kimi K3: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 32B and Kimi K3?
Qwen3 32B is made by Alibaba. Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI.