token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Mercury 3
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Mercury 3
Mercury 3 is 2.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3 Coder Flash | Mercury 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Inception |
| Input $/1M | $0.195 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $0.975 | $0.350 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.390 | $0.163 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3 Coder Flash if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Mercury 3 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $0.390 blended
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder Flash or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder Flash and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder Flash cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $0.390 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.195 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.975 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder Flash and Mercury 3 have?
Qwen3 Coder Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder Flash and Mercury 3?
Qwen3 Coder Flash is made by Alibaba. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons