token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Kimi K3

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Kimi K3

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is 13× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Kimi K3 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BKimi K3
ProviderAlibabaMoonshot AI
Input $/1M$0.300$3.00
Output $/1M$1.00$15.00
Blended $/1M$0.475$6.00
Context window262K1.0M
Max output66K
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.475 vs $6.00 blended
Choose Kimi K3 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B or Kimi K3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Kimi K3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B cheaper than Kimi K3?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is cheaper: $0.475 versus $6.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $3.00. Output alone: $1.00 vs $15.00.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Kimi K3 have?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: 262,144 tokens. Kimi K3: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Kimi K3?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is made by Alibaba. Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI.
Related comparisons