token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 8.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAlibabaAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.300$0.030
Output $/1M$1.00$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.475$0.055
Context window262K1M
Max output66K66K
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.475 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.475 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.030. Output alone: $1.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is made by Alibaba. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons