token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is 8.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructGemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.090$1.50
Output $/1M$1.10$7.50
Blended $/1M$0.343$3.00
Context window262K1.0M
Max output16K66K
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.343 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Gemini 3.6 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is cheaper: $0.343 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.090 vs $1.50. Output alone: $1.10 vs $7.50.
What context windows do Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct: 262,144 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons