token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is 2.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.150$0.300
Output $/1M$1.20$2.50
Blended $/1M$0.412$0.850
Context window262K1.0M
Max output236K66K
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.412 vs $0.850 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper: $0.412 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.300. Output alone: $1.20 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: 262,144 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking full details Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite full details Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Flint (free) Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Glimpse Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B