token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is 5.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Terra accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingGPT-5.6 Terra
ProviderAlibabaOpenAI
Input $/1M$0.150$1.00
Output $/1M$1.20$6.00
Blended $/1M$0.412$2.25
Context window262K1.1M
Max output262K128K
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.412 vs $2.25 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose GPT-5.6 Terra if…
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or GPT-5.6 Terra?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and GPT-5.6 Terra, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking cheaper than GPT-5.6 Terra?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper: $0.412 versus $2.25 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $1.00. Output alone: $1.20 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and GPT-5.6 Terra have?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: 262,144 tokens. GPT-5.6 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and GPT-5.6 Terra?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba. GPT-5.6 Terra is made by OpenAI.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking full details GPT-5.6 Terra full details Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Inkling Small