token.app › Compare › Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs Mercury 3

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs Mercury 3

Mercury 3 is 3.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructMercury 3
ProviderAlibabaInception
Input $/1M$0.210$0.100
Output $/1M$1.90$0.350
Blended $/1M$0.632$0.163
Context window262K1M
Max output33K131K
ReleasedSep 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Mercury 3 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $0.632 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $0.632 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.210 vs $0.100. Output alone: $1.90 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Mercury 3 have?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: 262,144 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Mercury 3?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct full details Mercury 3 full details Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs Flint (free) Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs Glimpse Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B