token.app › Compare › Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct vs Inkling

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct vs Inkling

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 6.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling accepts the larger context window (524K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructInkling
ProviderAlibabaThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$0.150$1.00
Output $/1M$0.600$4.05
Blended $/1M$0.262$1.76
Context window262K524K
Max output16K472K
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $1.76 blended
Choose Inkling if…
  • Larger context window (524K)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct or Inkling?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct and Inkling, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct cheaper than Inkling?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is cheaper: $0.262 versus $1.76 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $1.00. Output alone: $0.600 vs $4.05.
What context windows do Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct and Inkling have?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct: 262,144 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct and Inkling?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Inkling is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons