token.app › Compare › Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 7.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderAlibabaMeta
Input $/1M$0.150$1.25
Output $/1M$0.600$4.25
Blended $/1M$0.262$2.00
Context window262K1.0M
Max output16K
ReleasedOct 2025Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $2.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is cheaper: $0.262 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $1.25. Output alone: $0.600 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct: 262,144 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.
Related comparisons