token.app › Compare › Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 1.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingBeam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderAlibabaReflection
Input $/1M$0.290$0.250
Output $/1M$1.00$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.467$0.438
Context window262K1.0M
Max output236K131K
ReleasedOct 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.438 vs $0.467 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper: $0.438 versus $0.467 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.290 vs $0.250. Output alone: $1.00 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: 262,144 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking full details Beam 1.0 501B A23B full details Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Flint (free) Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Glimpse Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Mercury 3