token.app › Compare › Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 14× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAlibabaAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.200$0.030
Output $/1M$2.40$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.750$0.055
Context window262K1M
Max output33K66K
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.750 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.750 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $0.030. Output alone: $2.40 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons