token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is 3.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.5-122B-A10BGPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderAlibabaOpenAI
Input $/1M$0.290$0.100
Output $/1M$2.40$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.817$0.225
Context window262K1.1M
Max output82K128K
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $0.817 blended
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and GPT-5.6 Luna, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper: $0.225 versus $0.817 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.290 vs $0.100. Output alone: $2.40 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: 262,144 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is made by Alibaba. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.
Related comparisons