token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 3.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.5 397B A17B | Gemini 3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Input $/1M | $0.390 | $1.50 |
| Output $/1M | $2.34 | $7.50 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.877 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.877 vs $3.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Gemini 3.6 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is cheaper: $0.877 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.390 vs $1.50. Output alone: $2.34 vs $7.50.
What context windows do Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons