token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Inkling Small
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Inkling Small
Inkling Small leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Inkling Small is 2.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling Small accepts the larger context window (524K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.5 397B A17B | Inkling Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Thinkingmachines |
| Input $/1M | $0.500 | $0.450 |
| Output $/1M | $3.60 | $1.20 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.27 | $0.637 |
| Context window | 262K | 524K |
| Max output | 236K | 262K |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
| GPQA Diamond | 86.4% | 88.5% |
| FrontierMath T1–3 | 31.2% | 46.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 88.9% | 90.0% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Inkling Small if…
- Costs less per token — $0.637 vs $1.27 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (88.5% vs 86.4%)
- Higher FrontierMath T1–3 (46.3% vs 31.2%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (90.0% vs 88.9%)
- Larger context window (524K)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Inkling Small?
Across the 3 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads on 0 and Inkling Small leads on 3. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B cheaper than Inkling Small?
Inkling Small is cheaper: $0.637 versus $1.27 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.500 vs $0.450. Output alone: $3.60 vs $1.20.
What context windows do Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Inkling Small have?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Inkling Small?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is made by Alibaba. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons