token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-9B vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Qwen3.5-9B vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Qwen3.5-9B is 27× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.5-9BGemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.100$1.50
Output $/1M$0.150$7.50
Blended $/1M$0.113$3.00
Context window262K1.0M
Max output262K66K
ReleasedMar 2026Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3.5-9B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.113 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-9B or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5-9B and Gemini 3.6 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5-9B cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper: $0.113 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $1.50. Output alone: $0.150 vs $7.50.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-9B and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Qwen3.5-9B: 262,144 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-9B and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.5-9B is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons