token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-Flash vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Qwen3.5-Flash vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Qwen3.5-Flash is 3.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.5-FlashBeam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderAlibabaReflection
Input $/1M$0.065$0.250
Output $/1M$0.260$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.114$0.438
Context window1M1.0M
Max output66K131K
ReleasedFeb 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Qwen3.5-Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.114 vs $0.438 blended
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-Flash or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5-Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5-Flash cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper: $0.114 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.065 vs $0.250. Output alone: $0.260 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Qwen3.5-Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3.5-Flash is made by Alibaba. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons