token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderAlibabaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.260$0.150
Output $/1M$1.56$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.585$0.262
Context window1M1.0M
Max output66K393K
ReleasedFeb 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.585 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.585 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.260 vs $0.150. Output alone: $1.56 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Flint (free) Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Glimpse Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Mercury 3