token.app › Compare › Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Muse Spark 1.2
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Muse Spark 1.2
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 5.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.6 35B A3B | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Meta |
| Input $/1M | $0.140 | $1.25 |
| Output $/1M | $1.00 | $4.25 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.355 | $2.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.6 35B A3B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.355 vs $2.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 35B A3B or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.6 35B A3B and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.6 35B A3B cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is cheaper: $0.355 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.140 vs $1.25. Output alone: $1.00 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 35B A3B and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 262,144 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 35B A3B and Muse Spark 1.2?
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is made by Alibaba. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.